¹ Daniluck JC, Infertility : intrapersonal and interpersonal impact. Fertil. Steril. 1988. Vol 49 : 982-990
² Kirkman M. Infertile mothers : a perspective from research and experience. Towards reproductive certainty. Ed. R. Jansen and D. mortimer. The Partenon Publishing group. 1999 : 120-123.
³ Dill S. Consumer perspectives. In Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. WHO, 2001. http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/infertility/report.pdf
⁴ Whiteford LM et Gonzalez L, Stigma : the hidden burden of infertility. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Vol. 40 : 27-36
⁵ Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. WHO, 2001. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/ infertility/report.pdf
⁶ Fathalla MF. Current challenges in assisted reproduction. In Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. WHO, 2001. http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/infertility/report.pdf
⁷ Bromham D. R. Surrogacy : Ethical, legal and social aspects. 1995. J. of Assisted Reproduction. and genetics. Vol. 12, 509-516
⁸ Thomas, I. Histoire de la famille. Monde lointain. Sous la direction de A. Burguière.1986. 283-296
⁹ Giwa-Osagie O. Social and ethical aspects of assisted conception in anglophone sub-Saharan Africa. In Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. WHO, 2001.
¹⁰ Daniels K., The policy and practice of surrogacy in New Zeland. in Surrogate Motherhood- International perspectives. Hart Publishing. 2003. 55-73
¹¹ Utian WH et al. Preliminary experience with in-vitro fertilisation-surrogate gestational pregancy. Fertil. Steril. 1989. 52 : 633-638
¹² Brindsen PR et al. Treatment by in vitro fertilisation with surrogacy : experience of one british centre. 2000. British Medical Journal, vol. 320, 924-929
¹³ Blyth E. Surrogacy arrangements in Britain : policy and practice issues for professionnals. Human fertil. 1998. Vol. 1 : 3-5
¹⁴ Cotton K. et Winn D. Baby Cotton, For love and money, 1985.
¹⁵ Edelman, R. Psychological assesment in surrogate motherhood. Surrogate Motherhood - International perspectives. Hart Publishing. 2003. 55-73
¹⁶ Kok-Choo Chen and Heung-Tat Ng, Legal and ethical considerations of assisted reproductive technology and surrogate motherhood in AOFOG countries. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2001. 27, 89-95
¹⁷ Kirkman M. Sister-to-sister gestationnal surrogacy 13 years on : a narrative of parenthood. J. Reprod. Infant Psychol. 2002. Vol. 20 : 135-147
¹⁸ Laborie, F. La radicalité des mères porteuses. In : Sortir la maternité du laboratoire. Actes du forum international sur les nouvelles technologies de la reproduction. Université Concordia. 1987.
¹⁹ Bromham D. R. Surrogacy : Ethical, legal and social aspects. 1995. J. of Assisted Reproduction and genetics. Vol. 12, 509-516
²⁰ Van den Akker, OB. The importance of a genetic link in mothers commissioning a surrogate baby in the UK. Human Reprod. 2000. Vol 15 : 1849-1855.
²¹ E. Blyth. « I wanted to be interesting. I wanted to be able to say « I’ve done something interesting in my life » : interviews with surrogate mothers in Britain. 1994. J. of Reprod. and Infant Psychology. Vol. 12, 189- 198
²² A. Mechanick Braverman and SL Corson. Characteristics of participant in a gestational carrier Program. J. Assisted Reprod. Genetics. 1992. Vol 9 : 353-357
²³ Kleinpeter CH and Homan MM. Surrogate motherhood : personality traits and satisfaction with service providers. 2000. Psychological Reports. Vol. 87, 957-970
²⁴ Blyth E. « Not a primrose path » : commissioning parents’ experiences of surrogacy arrangements in Britain. J. Reprod. Infant Psychol. 1995. Vol. 13 : 185-196.
²⁵ Radin MJ. Market-inalienability. Harvard law review. 1987. Vol 100 : 1849-1937.
²⁶ Jadva, V et al. Surrogacy : the experience of surrogate mothers. 2003. Human Reprod. Vol.18 : 2196-2204
²⁷ Mac Callum et al. Surrogacy : the experience of commissioning couples. 2003. Human Reprod. Vol 18 : 1334-1342
²⁸ Kleinpeter CB. Surrogacy : the parents’ story. 2002. Psychol. Report. Vol 91 201-219
²⁹ Teman, E. Knowing the surrogate body in Israel. in Surrogate Motherhood- International perspectives. Hart Publishing. 2003. 55-73
³⁰ Kleinpeter, et al. (2001). Satisfaction with surrogate mothering: A relational model. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 4 (1), 61-84.
³¹ Brazier M.et al. Surrogacy - Review for health minister of current arrangements for payments and regulation. 1998.
³² Ragoné H. The gift of life : surrogate motherhood, gamete donation and constructions of altruism. In Surrogate Motherhood – International perspectives. Hart Publishing. 2003 209-226
³³ Lane, M. Ethical issues in surrogacy arrangements. In Surrogate Motherhood – International perspectives. Hart Publishing. 2003. 113-121
³⁴ Van Niekerk et Van Zyl. The ethics of surrogacy : women’s reproductive labour. 1995. J. Med. Ethics. 21 : 345-349
³⁵ Anderson ES. Is women’s labour a commodity ? Philosophy and public affairs. 1990. Vol. 19 : 71-92
³⁶ Fischer S et Gillman I. Surrogate motherhood : attachment, attitudes and social support. Psychiatry. 1991. Vol. 54 : 13-20
³⁷ Purdy LM in Van Zyl et Van Niekerk. Interpretations, perspectives and intentions in surrogate motherhood. J. Med. Ethics. 2000. 26 : 404-409
³⁸ McLachlan, HV. Defending commercial surrogacy against van Niekerk and Van Zyl. J. Med. Ethics. 1997.23 : 344-348
³⁹ Van Zyl et Van Niekerk, Interpretations, perspectives and intentions in surrogate motherhood. 2000. J. Med. Ethics. 26 : 404-409
⁴⁰ Andrews, LB. Surrogate motherhood : the challenge for feminists. In Gostin L. ed Surrogate motherhood : politics and privacy. Bloomington & Indianapolis. Indiana University press. 1990 : 168
⁴¹ Dickens, BM. Ethical issues arising from the use of assisted reproductive technologies. Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. WHO, 2001
⁴² Willmott, L. Surrogacy : ill-conceived rights. J. Law Med. 2002. Vol. 10 : 198-220
⁴³ Wilkinson, S. The exploitation argument against commercial surrogacy. Bioethics. 2003. Vol. 17 : 169-187
⁴⁴ Anleu SR. Surrogacy : for love but not for money ? Gender and Society. 1992. Vol 6 : 30-48
⁴⁵ V. Soderstrom-Antilla et al. Experience of in vitro fertilization surrogacy in Finland. Acta Obstet Gynecol. Scand. 2002. Vol. 81 : 747-752
⁴⁶ Ragoné H. Surrogate Motherhood. Conception in the heart. Boulder, Westview Press. 1994
⁴⁷ Aigen BP. Motivations of surrogate mothers : parenthood, altruism and self-actualisation (a three year study). 1996. http://www.surrogacy.com/psychres/article/motivat.html
⁴⁸ http://www.surromomsonline.com/support/showthread.php?t=47626&page=2&pp=20
⁴⁹ Van Niekerk, Van Zyl. Commercial surrogacy and the commodification of children : an ethical perspective. 1995. Med. Law. 14 : 163-170
⁵⁰ Parkinson J. et al. Perinatal outcome after in-vitro fertilization-surrogacy. 1999. Human Reprod, vol. 14, 671-676
⁵¹ Serafini P. Outcome and follow-up of children born after IVF-surrogacy. 2001. Human Reprod. Update. Vol. 7, 23-27.
⁵² Golombok S. Families created through a surrogacy arrangement : Parent- child relationships in the first year of life. Dev. Psychol. 2003. 40 : 400-411
⁵³ Cooper D. Biology, Genetic and Intent. www.aihle.org/cooper.pdf
⁵⁴ Granet F. L’établissement de la filiation maternelle et les maternités de substitution dans les pays de la CIEC. 2003. Perso.wanadoo.fr/ciec-sg/documentation/notePMA.pdf
⁵⁵ Chen M. Wombs for rent : an examination of prohibitory and regulatory approaches to governing preconception arrangements. Health Law in Canada. 2003. Vol. 23 : 33-52
⁵⁶ Brindsen, P. Clinical aspects of IVF surrogacy. Surrogate Motherhood – International perspectives. Hart Publishing 2003
⁵⁷ Edelman R. Psychological assessement in « surrogate » motherhood relationships. Surrogate motherhood – International perspective. 2003. 143-160
⁵⁸ Cook R. Safety in the multitude of counsellors : do we need counselling in surrogacy ? Surrogate motherhood – International perspective. 2003. 179-198
⁵⁹ Appleton T. Emotional aspects of surrogacy : a case of effective counselling and support. Psychological assessement in « surrogate » motherhood relationships. Surrogate motherhood – International perspective. 2003. 199-208
⁶⁰ Van den Akker OB. Organisational selection and assessment of women entering a surrogacy agreement in the UK. Human Reprod. 1999. Vol. 14 : 262-266
⁶¹ Gena Dodd. Surrogacy and the law. Surrogate motherhood – International perspective. 2003
⁶² Brindsen, P. Gestational surrogacy. Human Reprod. 2003. Vol. 9 : 483-491
⁶³ http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/ART00/section1.htm
⁶⁴ MA Stafford-Bell et al. Surrogacy in Australia : implantation rates have implications for embryo quality and uterine receptivity. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2001 : 13 (1) 99-104
⁶⁵ GI Meniru et IL Craft. 1997. Experience with gestational surrogacy as a treatment for fertility resulting from hysterectomy. Human Reprod. Vol. 12, 51-54.
⁶⁶ Depadt-Sebag, V. De la nécessité d’une réforme de l’article 16-7 du code civil relatif à l’interdiction de gestation pour autrui. Revue générale de droit médical. 2004. Vol. 12 : 135-155
⁶⁷ Schutz, R. Surrogacy in Israel : an analysis in practice. Surrogate motherhood – International perspective. 2003. 35-54
⁶⁸ Cook R. Introduction. Surrogate motherhood – International perspective. 2003. 1-19