GPA - Distilbène - MRKH - du mythe à la réalité - En savoir plus
précédente - sommaire - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - suivante
Bibliographie
1 Daniluck JC, Infertility : intrapersonal and interpersonal impact. Fertil. Steril. 1988. Vol 49 : 982-990
2 Kirkman M. Infertile mothers : a perspective from research and experience. Towards reproductive certainty.
Ed. R. Jansen and D. mortimer. The Partenon Publishing group. 1999 : 120-123.
3 Dill S. Consumer perspectives. In Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. WHO, 2001.
http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/infertility/report.pdf
4 Whiteford LM et Gonzalez L, Stigma : the hidden burden of infertility. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Vol. 40 : 27-36
5 Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. WHO, 2001. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/
infertility/report.pdf
6 Fathalla MF. Current challenges in assisted reproduction. In Current practices and controversies in assisted
reproduction. WHO, 2001. http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/infertility/report.pdf
7 Bromham D. R. Surrogacy : Ethical, legal and social aspects. 1995. J. of Assisted Reproduction. and
genetics. Vol. 12, 509-516
8 Thomas, I. Histoire de la famille. Monde lointain. Sous la direction de A. Burguière.1986. 283-296
9 Giwa-Osagie O. Social and ethical aspects of assisted conception in anglophone sub-Saharan Africa. In
Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. WHO, 2001.
10 Daniels K., The policy and practice of surrogacy in New Zeland. in Surrogate Motherhood- International
perspectives. Hart Publishing. 2003. 55-73
11 Utian WH et al. Preliminary experience with in-vitro fertilisation-surrogate gestational pregancy. Fertil. Steril.
1989. 52 : 633-638
12 Brindsen PR et al. Treatment by in vitro fertilisation with surrogacy : experience of one british centre. 2000.
British Medical Journal, vol. 320, 924-929
13 Blyth E. Surrogacy arrangements in Britain : policy and practice issues for professionnals. Human fertil.
1998. Vol. 1 : 3-5
14 Cotton K. et Winn D. Baby Cotton, For love and money, 1985.
15 Edelman, R. Psychological assesment in surrogate motherhood. Surrogate Motherhood - International
perspectives. Hart Publishing. 2003. 55-73
16 Kok-Choo Chen and Heung-Tat Ng, Legal and ethical considerations of assisted reproductive technology
and surrogate motherhood in AOFOG countries. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2001. 27, 89-95
17 Kirkman M. Sister-to-sister gestationnal surrogacy 13 years on : a narrative of parenthood. J. Reprod. Infant
Psychol. 2002. Vol. 20 : 135-147
18 Laborie, F. La radicalité des mères porteuses. In : Sortir la maternité du laboratoire. Actes du forum
international sur les nouvelles technologies de la reproduction. Université Concordia. 1987.
19 Bromham D. R. Surrogacy : Ethical, legal and social aspects. 1995. J. of Assisted Reproduction and
genetics. Vol. 12, 509-516
20 Van den Akker, OB. The importance of a genetic link in mothers commissioning a surrogate baby in the UK.
Human Reprod. 2000. Vol 15 : 1849-1855.
21 E. Blyth. « I wanted to be interesting. I wanted to be able to say « I’ve done something interesting in my
life » : interviews with surrogate mothers in Britain. 1994. J. of Reprod. and Infant Psychology. Vol. 12, 189-
198
22 A. Mechanick Braverman and SL Corson. Characteristics of participant in a gestational carrier Program. J.
Assisted Reprod. Genetics. 1992. Vol 9 : 353-357
23 Kleinpeter CH and Homan MM. Surrogate motherhood : personality traits and satisfaction with service
providers. 2000. Psychological Reports. Vol. 87, 957-970
24 Blyth E. « Not a primrose path » : commissioning parents’ experiences of surrogacy arrangements in
Britain. J. Reprod. Infant Psychol. 1995. Vol. 13 : 185-196.
25 Radin MJ. Market-inalienability. Harvard law review. 1987. Vol 100 : 1849-1937.
26 Jadva, V et al. Surrogacy : the experience of surrogate mothers. 2003. Human Reprod. Vol.18 : 2196-2204
27 Mac Callum et al. Surrogacy : the experience of commissioning couples. 2003. Human Reprod. Vol 18 :
1334-1342
28 Kleinpeter CB. Surrogacy : the parents’ story. 2002. Psychol. Report. Vol 91 201-219
29 Teman, E. Knowing the surrogate body in Israel. in Surrogate Motherhood- International perspectives. Hart
Publishing. 2003. 55-73
30 Kleinpeter, et al. (2001). Satisfaction with surrogate mothering: A relational model. Journal of Human
Behavior in the Social Environment, 4 (1), 61-84.
31 Brazier M.et al. Surrogacy - Review for health minister of current arrangements for payments and
regulation. 1998.
32 Ragoné H. The gift of life : surrogate motherhood, gamete donation and constructions of altruism. In
Surrogate Motherhood – International perspectives. Hart Publishing. 2003 209-226
33 Lane, M. Ethical issues in surrogacy arrangements. In Surrogate Motherhood – International perspectives.
Hart Publishing. 2003. 113-121
34 Van Niekerk et Van Zyl. The ethics of surrogacy : women’s reproductive labour. 1995. J. Med. Ethics. 21 :
345-349
35 Anderson ES. Is women’s labour a commodity ? Philosophy and public affairs. 1990. Vol. 19 : 71-92
36 Fischer S et Gillman I. Surrogate motherhood : attachment, attitudes and social support. Psychiatry. 1991.
Vol. 54 : 13-20
37 Purdy LM in Van Zyl et Van Niekerk. Interpretations, perspectives and intentions in surrogate motherhood.
J. Med. Ethics. 2000. 26 : 404-409
38 McLachlan, HV. Defending commercial surrogacy against van Niekerk and Van Zyl. J. Med. Ethics. 1997.23 : 344-348
39 Van Zyl et Van Niekerk, Interpretations, perspectives and intentions in surrogate motherhood. 2000. J. Med.
Ethics. 26 : 404-409
40 Andrews, LB. Surrogate motherhood : the challenge for feminists. In Gostin L. ed Surrogate motherhood :
politics and privacy. Bloomington & Indianapolis. Indiana University press. 1990 : 168
41 Dickens, BM. Ethical issues arising from the use of assisted reproductive technologies. Current practices
and controversies in assisted reproduction. WHO, 2001
42 Willmott, L. Surrogacy : ill-conceived rights. J. Law Med. 2002. Vol. 10 : 198-220
43 Wilkinson, S. The exploitation argument against commercial surrogacy. Bioethics. 2003. Vol. 17 : 169-187
44 Anleu SR. Surrogacy : for love but not for money ? Gender and Society. 1992. Vol 6 : 30-48
45 V. Soderstrom-Antilla et al. Experience of in vitro fertilization surrogacy in Finland. Acta Obstet Gynecol.
Scand. 2002. Vol. 81 : 747-752
46 Ragoné H. Surrogate Motherhood. Conception in the heart. Boulder, Westview Press. 1994
47 Aigen BP. Motivations of surrogate mothers : parenthood, altruism and self-actualisation (a three year
study). 1996. http://www.surrogacy.com/psychres/article/motivat.html
48 http://www.surromomsonline.com/support/showthread.php?t=47626&page=2&pp=20
49 Van Niekerk, Van Zyl. Commercial surrogacy and the commodification of children : an ethical perspective.
1995. Med. Law. 14 : 163-170
50 Parkinson J. et al. Perinatal outcome after in-vitro fertilization-surrogacy. 1999. Human Reprod, vol. 14,
671-676
51 Serafini P. Outcome and follow-up of children born after IVF-surrogacy. 2001. Human Reprod. Update. Vol.
7, 23-27.
52 Golombok S. Families created through a surrogacy arrangement : Parent- child relationships in the first year
of life. Dev. Psychol. 2003. 40 : 400-411
53 Cooper D. Biology, Genetic and Intent. www.aihle.org/cooper.pdf
54 Granet F. L’établissement de la filiation maternelle et les maternités de substitution dans les pays de la
CIEC. 2003. Perso.wanadoo.fr/ciec-sg/documentation/notePMA.pdf
55 Chen M. Wombs for rent : an examination of prohibitory and regulatory approaches to governing
preconception arrangements. Health Law in Canada. 2003. Vol. 23 : 33-52
56 Brindsen, P. Clinical aspects of IVF surrogacy. Surrogate Motherhood – International perspectives. Hart
Publishing 2003
57 Edelman R. Psychological assessement in « surrogate » motherhood relationships. Surrogate motherhood
– International perspective. 2003. 143-160
58 Cook R. Safety in the multitude of counsellors : do we need counselling in surrogacy ? Surrogate
motherhood – International perspective. 2003. 179-198
59 Appleton T. Emotional aspects of surrogacy : a case of effective counselling and support. Psychological
assessement in « surrogate » motherhood relationships. Surrogate motherhood – International perspective.
2003. 199-208
60 Van den Akker OB. Organisational selection and assessment of women entering a surrogacy agreement in
the UK. Human Reprod. 1999. Vol. 14 : 262-266
61 Gena Dodd. Surrogacy and the law. Surrogate motherhood – International perspective. 2003
62 Brindsen, P. Gestational surrogacy. Human Reprod. 2003. Vol. 9 : 483-491
63 http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/ART00/section1.htm
64 MA Stafford-Bell et al. Surrogacy in Australia : implantation rates have implications for embryo quality and
uterine receptivity. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2001 : 13 (1) 99-104
65 GI Meniru et IL Craft. 1997. Experience with gestational surrogacy as a treatment for fertility resulting from
hysterectomy. Human Reprod. Vol. 12, 51-54.
66 Depadt-Sebag, V. De la nécessité d’une réforme de l’article 16-7 du code civil relatif à l’interdiction de
gestation pour autrui. Revue générale de droit médical. 2004. Vol. 12 : 135-155
67 Schutz, R. Surrogacy in Israel : an analysis in practice. Surrogate motherhood – International perspective. 2003. 35-54
68 Cook R. Introduction. Surrogate motherhood – International perspective. 2003. 1-19
précédente - sommaire - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - suivante |
|